ANALYZE·ANALYSIS ON DEMAND

Analyze

One question, one committee of agents

Ask a strategic question: six agents examine it, each from its own angle, and Kairos turns it into a sourced recommendation.

Try InekIA See a real example

Video · 39 s

Analyze in action

Real screens from the app, on a fictional company. Captions available.

In-depth analysis ties up a team, and time.

A regulation, a competitor, a market to enter: to inform the decision, someone has to gather sources, cross-check them and reach a position. Meanwhile, the topic moves on.

01Decisions postponed for lack of facts

02Costly external studies for recurring questions

03Internal teams swamped by one-off requests

How it works

You ask a question

In classic mode, a structured brief; in conversation mode, an exchange that digs deeper.

A committee of agents examines it

Kairos gathers the sources. Six agents give their view: competition, technology, finance, market, customers, risk. A seventh checks their citations.

You get a sourced analysis

Synthesis, findings, the case for and against, risks, action plan and numbered sources. Ready to export and to turn into tracked decisions.

Who benefits?

Three roles, one shared need: turning a question into a reasoned position.

Executive

PAIN

I want to understand the impact of a new regulation without commissioning a study every time.

SOLUTION

A sourced synthesis, with risks and options, to prepare my decision.

CFO

PAIN

I am preparing a committee on a complex topic, with no team to do the groundwork.

SOLUTION

Each angle’s view, sourced figures and an action plan to discuss.

Consultant

PAIN

I run several engagements at once and background research takes too long.

SOLUTION

The base material, sourced; I add my value on the final recommendation.

Real example

A real analysis, published as is.

A question asked in Analyze, and the answer delivered: summary, risks, action plan, sources. Produced by Kairos on 5 October 2026, from 12 sources. No figure edited.

CRA/NIS2 Compliance Roadmap for EU Industrial Equipment Makers: 2026–2027

Cyber Resilience Act and NIS2: obligations, timeline and penalties for a European industrial equipment maker through 2027. What priorities for an executive c…

As of today (Oct 5, 2026), the CRA's vulnerability and incident reporting obligations became live on Sep 11, 2026, meaning any European industrial equipment maker with digital product elements is already in a legally enforceable reporting regime — non-compliance is an active, not future, risk. The Dec 11, 2027 deadline for broader lifecycle obligations (secure-by-design, CE marking, SBOM, support-period declarations…

Read the full report

Key findings

The Sep 11, 2026 reporting deadline is already past — any manufacturer without a live CSIRT/ENISA escalation workflow is in active violation TODAY, not in 14 months. The…
Contrarian angle: the default five-year support period will be the single most commercially disruptive CRA obligation for industrial equipment makers, more so than repor…
SBOM requirements are a forward-looking supply-chain intelligence forcing function, not merely a documentation exercise. Manufacturers relying on third-party firmware, e…

8.0/1012 sources3 actions6 min

All real examples